Re: HSBC Bank in Process of Collapsing

Yep all good points T!

You brought up a couple of points I haven't seen him back up by law or proof. Us being wards of the state & our all caps name being a trust.

We know for sure the state gets federal money for our social security accounts, but maybe they just put all that money for everybody into a savings account? Or an account like the general fund for the state? And that would mean we're not wards of the state? Plus that money is supposed to be used for your retirement, not your bills?

What I got from his stuff which I think is good:
1. File your Entry of Appearance paperwork separating yourself from the ALL CAPS NAME and making you an interested third party who is a flesh and blood person with a soul. (I think we should disinterested parties, instead of interested parties)
2. The plaintiff is a fiction, because there is no address or contact info because it doesn’t physically exist and cannot not testify against you or be cross examined.
3. No corpus delicti. Where is the harmed party or damaged property? The reality is, we the defendant are the corpus delicti since we are being harmed by them not doing their job.
4. Make the judge give a declaratory judgment stating they are calling the all caps name into court.
5. Show they are calling the birth certificate name (ALL CAPS NAME) to court and that's not us, because it’s a government registered name and we're not a party involved with that. The parties that should be called before the court are the state, Social Security and the US government. They are the required parties to be called before the court as defendants under rule 19. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_19
And that they are suing each other, and we are a third party.

He says the way to argue all this is:
Hold up your birth certificate and ask if they are calling the name on the certificate before the court. They have to say yes. Then ask them if the name on that birth certificate is registered to the state. They have to say yes. Then ask if the state got money from the federal government for that birth under the 1935 Social Security Act and put it into a trust or estate. They have to say yes. Then it is a state issue, not yours since the governor and/or attorney general are the receivers and take ownership of that money and act as trustees and are the registered agents for that trust. And ask why are they coming after me for money when there is no constitutional money and Federal Reserve notes are obligations of the United States and are nothing more than an IOU to the Federal Reserve and creates more debt? The government is supposed to take care of this matter. What would you like me to pay you with? An IOU since there is no money? This exposes the bankruptcy which they will force them to dismiss the case on top of all the other things you've brought up and proven.