Re: Evolution

What do you mean when you say that people on http://talkorigins.org
rely on ignorance of "the public"? Are they not members of the public?Are you the ignorant public? Why do you think they are trying to advance an agenda? Drug companies have an incentive to hype their products and downplay side effects but posters on talkorigins don't gain financially from the theory of evolution . Speaking of ignorance , where did you study physical anthropology , genetics biochemistry or any of the subjects one needs to study in order to understand evolution . Your post is devoid of any specifics regarding your disbelief in evolution .This is because you cant criticise the Science and therefore rely on vague nonsequitters. You write that you have checked some of the Science by looking at some posts on the net . The people on talkorigins have spent years at universities and you think that you can understand and criticise physics, chemistry etc by spending a few minutes on your computer.If you don't believe in the scientific method, why do believe that DNA exists or that it would be six feet long if the alleged double helix was unwound?I am sure you can't refute any of the logic and conclusions of the people on talkorigins but why don't you try debating with them . How many hours have you spent on the site?