I have been looking into some issues recently on which I could not find any qualified answers and I would like to raise a few points for discussion. When reading this please bear in mind : I am not making suggestions, I am asking questions here.

Could HCL be the better activator acid ?

citric acid is actually produced by some fungi, therefore it would not be too far fetched that citric acid provides a more friendly acidic environment for fungi than other acids. Could this contribute strongly to nausea and diarrhea reactions, maybe being even a very major factor when dosage increases ?

HCL in contrast is fully natural to the stomach and its intake could even contribute to reduce heartburn, besides some other potentially welcome side-effects. Of course the question here again is how much HCL is positive rather than negative ? But my impressions so far is, that it is unlikely to reach a problematic dosage with Miracle-Mineral-Supplement activation. Has anybody some more insight ?

The standard Miracle-Mineral-Supplement protocol uses a 10% citric acid and 3 minutes activation time. It seems obvious, and I believe it has been discussed here before, that this will result in to only a partial activation of the 28% NaCLO2 solution. Has anybody researched to what extent the activation reacts the NaCLO2 molecules in exactly 3 minutes : 20%, 50%, 80 % ?

With that standard method you would then have a combination solution of unactivated NaCLO2 plus the the ClO2. Right or wrong ?

From what I have been reading so far, NaCLO2 (unactivated) and CLO2 may have quite different effects when taken orally.
CLO2 would be reacting directly with pathogenic microbes when encountered somewhere in the body, while in contrast NaCLO2 would first have to be activated by some acidic environment before CLO2 is set free which could then oxidate the pathogen. Therefore my conclusion is that NaCLO2(unactivated) has its own pattern of effect.
Undoubtedly some part of the NaCLO2 would be activated in the stomach by its HCL. However I wonder if some NaCLO2 molecules would make it to the blood circulation ? Does anybody know, and if yes what proportions could one reasonably expect to reach the blood ?

If NaCLO2 molecules could reach the blood circulation then would it only be activated in direct contact with acidic (inflammatory) environments such as caused by pathogens and directly challenge the pathogens with fresh CLO2 on the spot ? Would that consequently mean NaCLO2 could reach further to kill fungus or cancer cell environments, since it does not react before reaching the acidic environment, while bypassing bacteria and viruses ?

However, if ALL of the NaCLO2 (unactivated) will be slowly activated inside the digestive system that would result in a slow and permanent production of CLO2 molecules over some time, right ? Again this may have a very different effect on pathogens than a large dosage hits 2-3 times a day.

My conclusion so far : the idea of the standard protocol with a partial NaCLO2 activation may have its distinct advantages as it is giving a large dose of immediately available CLO2 plus a potentially retarded (or on the inflammatory spot activated ) NaCLO2.

Therefore if Miracle-Mineral-Supplement is activated to 100%, as it can be done with a more potent acid (50% citric acid ,50 tartaric, 9% HCL), you could be potentially missing the combination effect. Of course one could instead add some unactivated NaCLO2 in the activated solution after having diluted it with water - if one would have an idea what proportion is optimal.

Dilution of activated MMS : does it matter how much water you use when preparing MMS ?

My logic would be : it would normally not make any difference to ones final CLO2 level in the blood, since the addition of water does not change the number of CLO2 and NaCLO3 molecules given to the body, you are just adding water molecules.Wrong or right ?

However I would assume it could have some different effect to ones intestinal tract - since one could expect to have more CLO2 molecules being forwarded further reaching into the intestinal tract as with less water. If that would be correct would one combat fungi, viruses and parasites in the intestinal tract possibly more effectively with more water added ? On the other side would one have to consider sides effect to the intestinal flora ? And not to forget that while pathogens are destroyed in the intestinal tract only a reduced number of CLO2 molecules would be left available to enter the blood circulation.

Your thoughts please.