*edited at bottom* Re: a-hash brown(e) eaten

I was more referring to the whole "going after 9th" thing ... I find it pretty sad that at the mere sight of her return people are already going after her. The jackals need their meat, I guess...

It's just the same cycles repeating...

Why don't you guys give her the benefit of the doubt? I'm not presuming that she's come back with innocent intent, but at least let her actions speak for themselves. Maybe she plans on being more cautious about what she does/says this time, but we would never know because you guys are immediately trying to bait her into getting riled up. It's like cornering a dog and poking it with a stick and then punishing the dog when it bites you. I hope for her sake that she's learned a bit more self-restraint.

This isn't so much aimed at you Grog as it is towards everyone getting "involved" again with all this 9th business (or those who will be soon) -- whether that includes you or not, who knows!

I'm just somewhat disgusted to see people jumping on this so quickly without even giving her a chance. Because, yes, she was in large part to blame for getting banned, but she certainly wasn't the only "guilty" one, as you all know damn well she received just as much provoking as she gave. She just wasn't as skilled at being "subtle" about her provoking, unfortunately. Sad, sad.

Yes, if she starts harrassing and provoking, then swift action should be taken. If she gets riled up by you "cunning" people and "reacts" and starts going after people, then unfortunately that's a fault of her own as far as Forum Rules are concerned. But as far as DECENT HUMAN INTERACTION is concerned, it's a bunch of bullcrap. If someone has a weakness, you don't go jabbing a dirty stick in it.

EDIT: To clarify even further, I wasn't ONLY referring to the 9th thing, just moreso. In general I was referring to the whole "thing" ... the "pattern" that seems to be emerging yet again...

--James