Calling me a coward you are...Spam regards the contents of the message, which IC has posted and you have backed up on many an occasion. I leave it to you to figure out your shortcomings. Why don’t you put up or shut up, or are you just going to call me another name or mimmick my responses?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

I am saying they have the right to posit their statement. Just like you have that right even though many of your messages do not relate directly to this forum.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Excellent quotes there;)   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Do you?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Spud, you should mention it on the forums where it is not relevant, not here, because that is irrelevant. Unfortunately we cannot cross post to the debate forums so posting to multiple lists individually is the only recourse. Were the messages sent indiscriminately?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

”In relation to (bewnyfur) I find him/her constantly on Spuds back which to me indicates to me that (bewnyfur) ”APPEARS to be trolling”, (read my post) properly.” Trolling implies that someone is baiting their messages, not responding to distortion. If anyone has been trolling it has been you and IC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

What is ironic is the ignorance of your posts, all one need to do is check the past messages.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

”Where, AustinM, have I supported spamming, where is your evidence? ” In the context of this thread all one must do is look for a thread in this forum started by IC and then read the message by Spud that follows and the ”spamming” support is evident.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

It mentions God in the message. That means it is relevant. Perhaps you should desist your ignorant comments.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

”As for your false accusations, as I’ve asked before, and you have not answered, if you are going to make accusations of my supporting spam, put up your evidence.” As far as the message goes I found it to be kind of funny, it really reminded me of the silly messages that IC posts and you back up with affirming comments. The message was relevant to this forum, by its very content.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Good call Austin, It is the good ole double standard.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

THE children of Charles Darwin, whose theories on evolution revolutionised science, may have been genetically blighted themselves — because of generations of inbreeding in his own family. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/genetics/article7114113.ece ”Among the 62 aunts, uncles, and cousins in the four generations founded by Josiah and Sarah, 38 remained childless. Just as Britain’s population was booming, the fertility of Darwins and Wedgwoods was falling.”   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Among the many claims of the ”scientific establishment” that of being neutral and objective is surely the most vaunted. The present essay will not seek to make a study of scientific objectivity in general, but rather to analyze the specific neutrality and objectivity manifest in the present day theoretical cornerstone of the scientific establishment: the theory of evolution. The following has been prepared on the basis of the conviction that Bronislow Malinowskiscientists are, despite their use of logic and experimentation, still human beings like the rest of us and as such need an explana ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Lol! Talk about a double standard.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

” The dysfunction rolls on and on and on and on.............” No thanks to your comments. ” And they wonder why we left the flock. It is kind of like getting to leave an insane asylum. and getting a clean bill of mental health. Freedom.” Is that last part a quote from Mel Gibson?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

LOL! just keeping things honest. http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1609649#i   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Inter-species mating results in sterile offspring. That means that ”Neanderthals” are actually probably just humans. Showing that this DNA finding may actually disprove certain evolutionary theories. In short...we still don’t know for sure. In other words the science of standard evolutionary theories is still left wanting. Perhaps some evidence can be manufactured, nice and psyentific like. **”Haldane’s rule relating to hybrids of species and extended to speciation in evolutionary theory is easily stated: When in the offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent ...
[retrieve this message]

---

”....orange has nothing on monkeyman.” Good job MM   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Researchers extracted DNA from the bone and reported Wednesday that it differed conspicuously from that of both modern humans and of Neanderthals, the archaic human species that inhabited Europe until the arrival of modern humans on the continent some 44,000 years ago. The child who carried the DNA lineage was probably 5 to 7 years old, but it is not yet known if it was a boy or a girl. The finger bone was excavated by Russian archaeologists in 2008 from a place known as the Denisova cave. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/science/25human.html?src=me The finger bone was found in a ...
[retrieve this message]

---

It’s being dubbed ”Tasmania’s Valley of the Kings.” At the site for a proposed freeway overpass, archaeologists have uncovered what they say are the earliest southernmost artifacts of human life. http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/archaeologists-find-40000-year-old-tools-at-tasmanian-construction-site/19391927   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

You have faith that your tests are sufficient to supply proof. Faith your observations are not skewed. Trust in the data supplied by scientific institutions. There are leaders of science, and people that have more of a say in the hierarchical structures of scientific institutions. Einstein is an example of a leader in physics. Society picks its leaders and he was one. Philosophical texts of Plato contain logic as does the Bible. Logic = The system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study. To say there are no universal truths flies in the face of l ...
[retrieve this message]

---

I find some parts of Darwin’s theory compelling, however it has definitely become a dogma among large segments of the population. People believe it wholeheartedly and it is authoritatively laid down by the so-called experts of the field. That is dogma. ”that which one thinks is true,” from dokein ”to seem good, think” Darwin’s theory is the theory right now, the site I left shows how the establishment has intentionally railroaded and attacked others that have put forth evidence that contradicted Darwinist claims. I’m interested to see what people think about those claims. Defending ...
[retrieve this message]

---

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_darwinism.htm   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

(PhysOrg.com) -- A newly discovered star outside the Milky Way has yielded important clues about the evolution of our galaxy. Located in the dwarf galaxy Sculptor some 280,000 light-years away, the star has a chemical make-up similar to the Milky Way’s oldest stars, supporting theories that our galaxy grew by absorbing dwarf galaxies and other galactic building blocks. http://www.physorg.com/news186842004.html   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Aren’t you just making a sweeping generalization of religion? Is conscience irrational? Is love rational? Do you have faith in science? Are there not leaders of science? What qualifies one to be a scientist? Science is systematic knowledge, Dealing with facts and truth, are these truths universal? Or do you merely have faith in them? This seems pretty logical to me.... James 1:27 Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

What I wonder is how would the fish have survived at 60,000 to 70,000 feet? Did they get altitude sickness?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Perhaps they were seeded by UFO’s. http://naturalplane.blogspot.com/2010/02/fish-literally-rain-down-on-australian.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+PhantomsAndMonstersAPersonalJourney+(Phantoms+and+Monsters) ”These fish were alive when they hit the ground.” He said it would have been an ideal weather situation to allow the phenomena to occur - but no tornados have been reported to the authority.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Hitler was merely a figurehead. The origins of Hitlers policies came from the US and England. And yes, they were deemed to be scientific. Also let’s not forget the other henchmen in his ranks Himmler, Goebbles, and Mengele. Eugenics was definitely based on science of the time. Now eugenics has been rebranded with the name Bioethics. It originally came out of Cold Springs Harbor where much of the current Human Genome research is taking place. Survival of the fittest at its finest. Eugenics -- Breeding a Better Citizenry Through Science http://personal.uncc.edu/jmarks/eugenics/eugen ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Sydney: Biochemists have stumbled on a critical piece in the evolutionary puzzle that explains how life on earth has evolved, says a new study. Researchers from Monash University School of Biomedical Sciences described the process by which bacteria developed into more complex cells and found this crucial step happened much earlier in the evolutionary timeline than suspected. Trevor Lithgow, who led the study, explained how mitochondria, which powers human and other cells and provides complex eukaryotic cells with energy and ability to produce, divide and move, were thought to hav ...
[retrieve this message]

---

”There is no-one trying to force these ideas on others either. ” No? Propaganda is not exactly force, but it is a means to a perceived end. There are many scientists who ARE trying to force their dogma on others, bio-ethics comes to mind. Just because you don’t know or perceive any scientists that are trying to do so, does not mean they do not exist. I have met many in my life, and they are currently working to impose their dogma just like the religions of old have done. Psychologists consider themselves to be scientists they definitely impose their beliefs on others. The Nazi’s ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Sounds like an interesting study, keep us posted. ”As for theories about the origin of the universe and life, I have no interest in theories that require a belief in a god, as I have seen no evidence that proves that a god exists, so any theory based on the assumption of there being a god, is flawed from the outset.” So your mind is closed to the idea of a vital force that is, so far, beyond the scope of science and human understanding? Consider vortex mechanics.. http://www.feandft.com/55%20Vortex%20Mechanics.htm   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Alien life from outer space is considered as supernatural by some. Generally because they have a lack of understanding of the mysterious components of such forms...which is logical at this point in time. Super Origin: lien life from outer space is considered as supernatural by some. Generally because they have a lack of understanding of the mysterious components of such forms...which is logical at this point in time. Super Origin: L super (prep. and v. prefix) above, beyond, in addition, to an especially high degree; -natural formed by-the material world, esp. as surrou ...
[retrieve this message]

---

”Science doesn’t know how life was begun, or the origins of the universe, and has never claimed to. Although there are many theories, they remain theories without any proof. Scientists simply don’t know how life began, or the origins of the universe, at this point in time, and happily admit this.” I agree the I deal science has remained skeptical, how ever to say that ”scientists” have never claimed to know the origins, is not fully true. If you watch any science TV programming they generally state as matter of fact that the ”Big Bang” was how it all began. I haven’t really observed th ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Health club warns aliens will eat ’fatties’ first One of Britain’s biggest health clubs has been criticised for putting up a sign warning ”fatties” they would be eaten first by aliens. http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_3627343.html?menu=news.quirkies A mainstream health club. The club, one of the largest independent health clubs in the UK, has two purpose-built studios and offers more than 100 fitness classes each week.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Humans are all aliens who came to earth from outer space, a leading British scientist has claimed. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7136269/All-humans-are-aliens-from-outer-space-scientist-claims.html The Astrobiologist said the first ”seeds of life” were deposited on our planet from space 3,800m years ago. **I thought it was made from carbon and a lightning bolt.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---