Re: MMS vs H202 by scherzo14 ..... Parasites Support Forum (Alt Med)
Date: 4/19/2012 11:57:35 PM ( 10 years ago ago)
"I'd imagine longterm H202 is less nasty to the body (degrades into water & oxygen, no chlorine accumulation in hair, no moving of Iodine in the thyroid) than Miracle-Mineral-Supplement , and as such would be more attracted to it for internal use."
Just as an example, in one published study, H202 administration to rats at the concentration of 0.1% for 25 weeks produced measurable oxidative damage to liver, kidney and lung tissues of all the rats --- and most likely every place else they didn't specifically check. And it damages DNA. Do you also irradiate yourself on a regular basis?
There's a reason why we produce more than one enzyme to try and break it down as fast possible. And lab animals engineered to overproduce H202 degrading enzymes in certain parts of the cell live longer, healthier lives with potentially slowed aging. In one lifespan study, rodents engineered to overproduce peroxide-degrading enzymes just in the heart alone showed dramatically extended lifespans. And you're supplementing with it???
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.06 sec, referred by www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1931309