Re: Those sites don't explain the GAO "chaff" or Chemtrail insider reports by VOR ..... Chemtrails Debate Forum
Date: 7/24/2008 3:42:10 PM ( 11 years ago ago)
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
Again, I am not on any quests. The burden of explanation lies with the prosecution. Nobody (that I have ever read or talked with) has ever been able to adequately explain to me why these chemtrails are not normal contrails. It is always based in the fictional assumption that contrails can't persist when in fact simple meteorological physics show they can, and have throughout aviation history.
The GAO report is not a revelation of anything or anything remotely implicating the govt in a chemtrail admission. The term "chemtrail" is not even uttered in the report. I can't really understand your excitement in that even if the Conspiracy is true.
Although I have not yet read Sunver's posts, I have on many occasions read other so-called "insiders" claims and I have not found any of them very credible. I suspect the same with Sunver but will certainly read what they have to say.
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.03 sec, referred by www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1222362