I found Kevin's 'tone' to be challenging, and his description of his symptoms seemed, to me, to want the advice of a professional.
No one of his posts stands out as 'offensive', although his language is rather colorful, here and there, that's why I used the term 'threads', and didn't click on the Webmaster buttons.
You ask how I determined the 'scope and intent' of the CureZone.
Don't we all make this assessment? Isn't that why we are All here, because we feel that CureZone is as honest and sensible as we hope? Don't we admire Spirit's purpose and efforts?
If you read those threads, you'll see that two responders were thinking Munchausen's over the sheer number of his posts, and new threads. Someone else mentions the word 'provocative'.
Pat's answer may refer to a revealing explanation, and a useful diet as a 'test' for this fellow. I don't know. I surely do like the concept at the website Pat suggests, but if Pat were truly a 'professional', I doubt he, or she, would jump in and say flat-out that he, or she, 'knows' the answer.
I believe that we must respect the distance and anonymity these screens afford. No, we can't know the full story behind any post, but, it is better if we use good judgement in both asking questions, and in answering them.
Yes, anyone may come here for help, and anyone may answer. This is mine.
Earlier today, I watched the "Agrees with this message" on my initial post jump from "2 out of 3" to "1 out of 3".
May any poster on the CureZone change their vote like that?
Sorry I ruffled your feathers, guys. That was never my intention.