again, you are in error. reports and personal experience do not equal scientific findings, true. however!! thats where Science begins! thats the foundation of Science - something interesting occurs and so you investigate it. so to say these things are "scientifically meaningless" as you keep repeating is to demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of what Science is.
also u said " "then it should be easy to carry out clinical trials to test them. The interesting question here is, why has no one done so?"
do you have a clue how much "clinical trials" cost? any idea at all? are you willing to donate the money to set up these clinical trials? if so, please contact mr. ellis and let him know, and we can get this show on the road. lack of evidence is not evidence of lack.
you CAN say "no hard scientific studies exist on this water" because its a true statement. you CANNOT say "this water is a total scam" because you have NEVER once touched smelled tasted or had first hand experience with this water. why not get some and start doing some of this science you allege you support?
i get so sick and tired of this BS from ppl. most cutting edge findings CANNOT get funding exactly becuase of the attitude you demonstrate here - total dismissal out of hand with no first hand experience, and writing off all personal anecdotes and results as fantasy and the ever popular "placebo effect."
i dare you to invent some cutting edge technology and then get some funding of hundred of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars to do clinical trials. go ahead, afterall as you say it should be so very easy to get funding, right?
"The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Curiosity has it's own reason for existing."