I just posted a reply. It was accepted, but by the time I got back to the forum page it had been deleted.
Or maybe that was because the post I responded to had been wiped off. I'll give it another go.
The original post included the statement "As it is, you are just a pawn being used in a silly war between moderators…."
I thought that any "war", if that's what you call it was between two factions of users, not moderators.
The one faction being those who think that anyone with outrageous notions about living on air, not needing food or water, etc etc should not be in a position to give advice on CZ. Especially when those notions are backed up by untrue statements that some people who need help might fall for. The other faction being those who seemed absolutely determined that this person should have a forum and be able to dole out his dangerous advice.
You already have one hypoglycemic poster who has followed his advice and reported "I've given your diet a go, by only eating fruit when I feel hungry during the day, but by mid-day my blood Sugar crashes and I crave meat and fat." Cant you see how dangerous this man's advice is, or dont you care anymore?
Is the only thing that matters now getting CZ even higher in the Alexa rankings? Position 8569 in the 60 million or so websites in the world is very good. Maybe people dont know how good. It has been estimated that any site in the top 10.000 could be sold for $several million.
Is staying in the top 10.000 now the overriding factor, way above doing good? Shelley's loss must have jeopardized that, is that why MH was roped in?