A "God type figure", golfegg? second coming of RELIGION?

You said that you ALSO believe that God is love? I didn't say I believe that, I didn't suggest that anyone should agree. For a Christian who reads the WHOLE bible (not just Revelation), it is found in one of the most popular verses (1 John 4:16). Revelation tells of the second coming of Christ, not RELIGION. It seems like you picked apart my post pretty well, but you only accuse me of saying what I didn't say. I didn't deny ALL science, I said it is VERY useful but consists of NATURAL limitations. Satan does not CAUSE evil, we do. When you curse at someone, DON'T BLAME IT ON SATAN, YOU committed that evil, not satan. Satan only encouraged it, YOU did the deed. This is why there is so much evil in the world committed by GOOD people, because they can't believe that they could possibly do wrong, they always place the blame somewhere else. Neither does satan dictate to us that we should use Science or any kind of understanding to deny God, we add BIAS and choose to construct scientific explanations to deny God. The phrase "never to be repentant" means they refuse to acknowledge God properly and show gratitude, therefore they are UNGRATEFUL/ingrates). I never even heard the term "spiritual progression" in my whole life.

Your whole post seems a little confrontational and defensive, could there be some 'agenda bias'? Could it be the statement about schematics, plans and formulas doesn't fit your empirical study of a spiritual cosmos?

This is a 'proper and effective communication used constructively to arrive at a meaningful conclusion' debate forum, not a 'pick apart the post and attack the messenger forum' or a 'confront each other instead of discuss the issue like intelligent human beings forum'. PEACE, please.

That spiritual progression might go well with RELIGION, but Christianity is not a religion.
Tweet