I do not know the specific details of the court case, but there are numerous related articles that touch on this topic throughout the web. I gather this "case" went down about 2 years ago. When people hear or use the word "court" they tend to think of old-fashioned terms of justice as it applies to the use of common law, fair proceedings, innocent until proven guilty and such, but this is an example that had much more to do with a fabricated, rigged tribunal that was not really a legitimate case of justice being prosecuted and served.
#1, she was there because 'da man wanted to punish and or ruin her, in actuality it was one of 'da man's more wimpish, girly-type minions - the AMA and it's syndicate of well-healed stuffed-shirts who pull her strings that lead the charge against Hulda;
#2, the practical outcome was very costly - both to Hulda in terms of the $$$ required in trying to defend herself as well as to the masses at large who have had another layer of establishment barriers put between them and the widespread availability of simple information on low-cost homeopathic healthcare; of course another practical result is that the high-cost, cruel and unusual, establishment-sponsored procedures and drugs now stand more prominently as guard between these two end points, or in other words, we all lost. Merck and their ilk are free to patent and pander costly poisons that kill and maim under the guise of being life-saving healthcare, but should any one outside this club try to bring simple and inexpensive health information to the masses, the heavy hand of 'da man's made justice will fall down upon them.
#3, Hulda is still alive, well and practicing, but in a much more guarded fashion. She still treats patients but only those terminally ill. I do not know for sure where here clinic is but believe it's either Mexico or southern California. You can still find her on the web to find out more about her and her work, but be prepared to observe the shackles that have been placed upon her as far as what information she "legally" can and cannot provide.