Are you aware that this thread was moved to a debate forum and is no longer taking place in your forum...?
I'm starting to suspect that you're only responding to these posts from email notifications, and haven't realized that the thread isn't in your forum anymore...
I'm pretty sure the thread was placed here due to the issues it raised concerning the newsletter. And since it is "here" now (IN CUREZONE OPEN DEBATE), pretty much EVERYONE has a place "here" to voice their thoughts and opinions on the matter. You are as welcome "here" just as much as I am.
I'm certainly not trying to tell anyone whether or not they should believe in UT. That's their choice and really makes no difference to me. The main point of my earlier posts was with regards to the newsletter issue, and how just because something is in the newsletter, does not mean Curezone is "endorsing" it in the way that you think.
But, when people start stating openly how UT is bad, citing some pretty poor arguments (the only two arguments against UT people seem to come up with are "animals don't do it, so that's proof that it's bad", and "the body obviously wants to get rid of it, so why take it back in?"), I'm going to speak up and provide counter-argument to that.
I realized quite a while ago that trying to hold a friendly debate with you is futile. But that's not really my concern. My posts aren't for you anymore. The primary reason I continue to post about UT "here" (on this OPEN DEBATE FORUM) is to provide counter-point to those who would have others believe that UT is bad simply because animals don't do it! My main purpose in posting responses to those things, is to provide different perspectives, for those more open-minded among us who are willing to explore those perspectives. Whether "my" perspective is right, or wrong, I cannot say. I know it's "right" for me, but whether it's right for another, only they can know for themself. But they should at least know that that alternative perspective exists, and the argument "for"/behind it.
I do realize however, that this isn't the place for debating whether or not UT is "good" or "bad", and I probably won't post anymore as far as that goes. :) From what I can tell, the thread was placed here to discuss the newsletter "problem"... which I have commented on pretty well, I think.