AGAIN im not saying that the process isnt beneficial in some ways
WHAT im saying is now more than ever i do not believe that our livers are full of these stones
they would be found and studied in autopsys.
they would cause all kinds of jaundice and other bile poisionings if the liver was compacted with hundreds of stones and the gall bladder is unable to hold that large of a number ....people have flushed back to back with large numbers exiting each time and the bladder is simply not big enough and the liver simply would give out after impacted with hundreds or thousands of stones in people in thier teens and 20's, not to mention a lifetime of stone production with no flushing
ALSO how do u explain those with no gallbladders and all the documented stuff by certain docs who acknowledge Liver Flushing claiming its an alternative to GB surgery and have headings like "SOFTENING OF Gallstones WITH APPLE JUICE AND OIL?" how do the account for people with no gallbaldders passing hundreds of stones?.
again i feel something else occurs during a flush to cause stones to form, whether its just soap stones or actual toxins from the body i dont feel they are there b4 the flush at least not the non gallstone stones
there was a guy who said he knew his were 90% bile, well bile is liquid, and the so called analysis i was directed to claimed 93% cholesterol?
again nothing but contradictions and run around