>He was the first perfect homosapian to be called Man by God, as Adam was made perfect, in comparison to imperfect homosapians that preexisted him. Science has again nailed it.
Maybe Adam was one of the first homosapien, neolithic men. Assuming evolution is untrue, that we don't come from monkeys, then the first man was a person with emotions, and needs, like us modern men. Therefore, no Science hasn't really nailed anything. Adam was possibly one of those cavemen, or neolithic men.
>Dust is a designation for non spiritual Man.
Where do you get this stuff from? That's makes no real sense. Dust is not symbolic of really anything. Rice is symbolic of fertility. Dust is not symbolic of anything. So you extrapolate on nonsense. Your whole argument is nonsense.
First you say Adam was not perfect b/c he came from dust, then you say God made him perfect after God made him from the dust. Which is it? Was Adam imperfect or not?
God righteousness has always been there. It doesn't have to be fulfilled. God is pure, good, loving, merciful, light, etc.
What Bible do you read? You just seem like you make things up as you go.
I will pray that God gives you enlightenment on these many things about Him that you need understanding on.