Re: Anyone care to explain this?

Hi, Golfegg....don't you know me by now?....I'm just flexing my literary capabilities on here...but you may be right...maybe that was a bit strong :) I didn't mean to come off quite that offensive...I'll go back and edit it.

But then again, if you think about it, if the evolutionists up and change EVERYTHING (which is the direction it's headed) then surely you would have to admit that this would be downright huge....this would be the hugest coverup of all-time. Do you not see this? Do you not see that the scientific community (alongside the medical community) is responsible for the death and destruction of millions of people? The medical community is responsible for the PHYSICAL destruction of society, while the scientific community is responsible for the MENTAL destruction. You may be perfectly fine just sitting around happily taking it with a grain of salt, but I'm not. I just simply cannot turn a blind eye to 150 years of nothing but conveluted lies and untruths. I can't turn a blind eye from 75 years of indoctrinating children in school with a wacked-out theory that has absolutley no proof what-so-ever. I can't turn a blind eye to the medical establishment that just lets people die from cancer or diabetes without telling them about the REAL way of curing themselves. .

And Macro evolution? Think about it golfegg. Gradualism has been all but disproven. Are you telling me that organisms have the ability to morph species in just a few generations based on their external environment? You're a smart guy, golfegg....and I know that you realize that we are products of our environments: both internal and external. We have wisdom within...and this wisdom allows us to be adaptive to our surroundings. You cannot tell me that a human who is defined by love came from any animal that doesn't have that. Nature cannot manufacture love....that comes built-in....and either an animal has it or he doesn't. Yet we are the only creature on the earth that has such a thing.

And there's one other thing about macroevoluiton....there's no proof of it ever happening. It seems to me instead of me having to disprove it, that Science would have to prove it. And besides that....It's being shown that instead of Evolving, we're actually DEVOLVING. Whenever an animal changes physiologically, he actually loses information. For example...do you know why some bacteria become resistant to Antibiotics ? ....they do it by losing sensitivity -- by losing information within the gene. But a mutation that loses information -- even if it benefits the organism -- does not qualify as an example of neo-darwinism, because they claim to be able to ADD information. But it's just the opposite. Our society is going downhill, not uphill.

Take care, Golfegg...I'll try to contain myself in the future :) S








Tweet