Re: So I guess that's it then?
I'm not denying that animals have changed over time.....what I'm saying is that Darwin's whole platform has been turned on its head. Do you understand the ramifications of this? It means the world at large has been deceived and LIED TO on a truly MASSIVE scale! I don't know about you but this puts fear into me. It's the same when you look at the cancer/disease industry. I'm not saying that all doctors and are all scientists are evil, but both these industries are equally corrupt from the top down, creating disciples who don't know any better. Fortunately the internet will eventually bring both these Giants to their knees.
As far as macro-evolution goes, it has been proven impossible. I've given links showing this genetic impossibility....there are also numerous mountains that evolutionists haven't climbed yet, such as Michael Behe's irreducible complexity, which has not yet been refuted. It's also been shown mathematically impossible. (I can give you a link if you'd like). Ultimately though, the proof is in the pudding.....There has been no proof in the fossil record or in labratory studies that macroevolution could have possibly happened.
If someone believes that macroevolution has happened, then they better be prepared to show me the following things:
1. Name any two distinct species fossil -- present or past -- and present any evidence from any source that one is ancestral to the other.
2. Name a mammalian species younger than Homo sapiens.
3. Present evidence that any new species has evolved in historical times.
If Darwin's version of evolution based on random (chance) mutations was true, we would surely have seen a new species deveolop in the recent history. As it is though, evolution has seems to have completely stopped, and animals are simply not "randomly mutating"...as predicted by Darwin. Instead, they're merely adapting to their environment -- just like they've done from the beginning of creation. This goes against everything Darwinists stand for.
-----------------
"Evolution is for all practical purposes no longer in progress and I still await specific examples of a progressive ascending process in operation anywhere on earth. All that I see is the exact opposite, with innumerable life forms disappearing at an alarming rate, never to be replaced" John Davison, Phd
-----------------
Evolution, in the traditional sense means a slow, gradual buildup of information over time...in reality however we've experienced DEVOLUTION, which is a slow, gradual REDUCTION of information. This would make sense because the world was formed perfectly, as Adam was designed to live forever until sin entered the world. Since then, things have been going downhill. If "Evolution" has been disproven, then Man coming from an APE would therefore be impossible.
http://www.evolutionisdegeneration.com/index.asp?PaginaID=1100