Even less on moreless

it is only your ignorance that allows you to think so. It in fact fits quite nicely into Evolutionary ideas.

You, out of ignorance or dishonesty, oversimplify evolution in order to attack an idea that has you frightened like a little child.

"Oversimplification

Evolutionists and creationists have many differences, but they share one common trait: they tend to oversimplify their explanations of the process by which life began.

Evolutionists are always trying to find evidence that shows the evolutionary process is a natural rule of physics. Scientists have a bias toward believing that the atoms that make up DNA naturally fall into place if given the right environment.

They often speculate on the probability of life forming on other planets. Every time a probe explores one of the planets or moons in our solar system, engineers are looking for evidence of life. Mars is often cited as possibly having the right conditions for the formation of life.

Even if Mars were a mirror copy of Earth, with perfect conditions for supporting living organisms, it would still be highly unlikely that any type of life would form on that planet. The odds are stacked so heavily against the formation of the complex molecular structures, the discovery of living organisms in any other region of our own solar system would only serve to prove the existence of a divine Creator.

It is reckless for someone to think it is a simple feat to have 3 billion amino acid molecules perfectly link up to form the basic genetic code of life. All scientists should find themselves forced to use the term "miracle" when assessing the odds for life forming on any planet.

In the game of chance, evolutionists are way ahead of themselves. Not only are their missing links missing, but so are a thousand other steps that would require non-living matter to form into life.

Creationists make their oversimplification error by claiming the world around us can easily be described by the information found in the Bible, which they frequently try to portray as an all-inclusive scientific document.

Despite the claims by some Christians, God's Holy Word is not a book of science. The Bible is factual, but because it makes such broad statements about our complex world, it is counterproductive to try to go beyond its original text. I've read many of examples of Christians going through the Bible and gleaning out statements that appear to be scientific in nature.

This type of activity seems noble, but it invites critics to point out how these examples seem to conflict with known scientific truths. Creationists often claim that the deep oceanic trenches are fountains of the deep that eject most of the water that comprised the Noadic Flood. Geologistsl point out that the Earth's core is hot just up to its crust and these trillions of gallons of water would come out as super-heated steam.

Because God could have acted supernaturally at any point in history, it's dangerous to assume that any Bible passage can be explained with scientific methodology. "


Tweet