Re: Some responses

.........................keep putting the puzzle together..........................

It's sad that people will wait for the pain of shock before deciding to come face to face with their conditioned (learned) prejudices, although this is what most people do. They do it simply because the prejudice against natural medicine/healing is not unveiled and talked about by teachers in school(s) (or by parents), the place where one would expect to get a grip on one's own prejudice(s) in order to examine it later.

1)Here is a debate that goes to the heart of your issue. If you prefer a conversation-type way of gathering information, rather than a listing of facts as in a dictionary or encyclopedia go back to page 4 in this debate forum (near top) and click on "Could this be gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365,.....by Webmaster." It continues over several pages even including eating natural dye material (ie.beets) that sticks to Gallstones along with doing the liver flush. This was done to make what comes out more readily verifiable. (Chemistry or logic majors--enjoy)

2)Here is a "Lab report [that] reveals flushed stones [retrieved from toilet bowl] consistent with Gallstones by #10360 (06/01/2005)." Here is the link inside that post that takes you to pictures and lab report. They look like creek rocks. http://www.angelhealingcenter.com/GallstonePictures.html

3)All of the flushed "stones" did not get gooey and disappear as many of the Liver Flush participants put their results in jars and took their results to their doctors. Stones from gb surgery or from Liver Flush have to be placed in solution in order to preseve their longevity.

For a story about length of time, read "Experience: Calcified Stones?...(05/03/02)" simply type in "gallstones, jar" into the search box at top right and then scroll down to the 4th entry with the same title.

All of your friends who prejudge what comes out in Liver Flushes will have already decided that only those Gallstones removed by surgery are gallstones. There isn't any amount of lab tests or lengthy arguments that will convince them because,
it will go against their PRINCIPLE THAT ONLY SURGERY CAN GET GALLSTONES. (..or find them out)

The more arguments and pictures you bring out to show the opposite the angrier they will get.

They need to experience it to believe it. That will be very convincing. Then they won't need 1,000 lab reports from other people's liver flushes. On a cold, winter day, if you are the one in the cold, would you rather read about the warmth of the sun, or experience it?

Like someone said, "No man is an island." We are all influenced by others. How much of your skepticism is caused by you and how much by others?

Ask yourself, since I started this program I'm on, is my thinking:
A. Clearer
B. Worse
C. the same
Tweet