Re: And Now

I agree that Science SHOULD meet religion, but the problem is today's "science" is not Science at all -- it's dogma masquerading as science. Just by judging some of the Debate Forums around the internet I'm sensing a real acknowledgement to this assertion. For instance, here's a recent post from a Scientist who has a Phd in zoology (I believe) who is not a Christian, yet he states:

"The Darwinian atheists have steadfastly pretended that they never had any critics. The members of this forum continue to prattle on about mutations having a role in evolution when there is not a shred of evidence to support that contention. Evolution though randomness and natural selection is a gigantic illusion based on the unwarranted assumption that phylogeny had an exogenous cause. Such a cause cannot be demonstrated because it does not now and never did exist.

The most intensive selection has never surpassed the species barrier. Accordingly NOTHING in the Darwinian fairy tale ever had ANYTHING to do with evolution beyond the establishment of varieties. That is all that Darwin was able to show because that is all that selection can achieve. For many life forms even that is quite impossible. No contemporary organism is demonstrably capable of becoming anything very different from what it is right now. Get used to it. Robert Broom did, Julian Huxley did, Pierre Grasse and Otto Schindewolf inferred as much and so have I.

Some one send me an email when the discussion gets to the subject of this thread. Until then I see no reason to further participate. Darwinism is dead as a hammer and was at its inception."

"Science commits suicide when she adopts a creed."
Thomas Henry Huxley

-- John A. Davison
------------------------------



Tweet