I think you've missed the point yet again refreshed. It isn't a question of my impatience, and the comparison with the perceived 'delay' regarding the second advent is baseless, for Peter gives us the reason in 2 Peter 3 - namely, that God is not willing that any should perish when it finally arrives.
No, the point is all the falke stories surrounding its 'fulfilment', which have all been 'current' since the 1930's at least, and reached fever pitch just after the 6 Day War in 1967. It wasn't just The Christian that reported on this 'story,' but Christianity Today as well.
But it was a complete fiction, and you hafta ask yourself, what credibility can you attach to a hermeneutic that engenders such rabid nonsense? It is the source that is the problem, on the same basis that a fish always stinks from the head.