CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: The 5 Points of FINALISM
 
loquat1 Views: 1,002
Published: 7 y
 
This is a reply to # 2,387,797

Re: The 5 Points of FINALISM


It's badly written, but not a bad effort. That comparison table is possibly its best feature.

I still prefer Woodrow though. He has a clear and easy style that lends itself to good comprehension. I believe both he and a number of other authors who have written on the subject (such as J Marcellus Kik, Jon Zens and T Boersma, to name just a few) make a compelling case for a 1st C. fulfilment of the bulk of Mt 24. Transporting the whole lot to the 21st C (or later???) ignores context, and is just a lazy way out of dealing with historical fact and fulfilment.

I particularly like Zens' treatment in a slightly wider context here:

http://www.searchingtogether.org/burden.htm

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.281 sec, (1)