Re: Argumentative Debating.

The only thing of history that is altered is that the true reasons of conflicts are hardly mentioned. But even that can be dug up with enough investigation.
As for the video its full of erroneous thinking for even with genealogy can history be confirmed.To take this reasoning to the extreme nothing is true including the bible which uses a lot of genealogy. including the Egyptians.
There are many other ways to dating something. He says European history is not older than 400 is saying that history never happened. Just because because one person says something it doesn't make it true. The dead see scrolls have proved the bible to be true
Even creationist like creation.com would be against this pseudo book.
A quote: Fomenko ... is highly selective and ignores the basic principles of sound historical scholarship.Fomenko... provides no fair-minded review of the historical literature about a topic with which he deals, quotes only those sources that serve his purposes, uses evidence in ways that seem strange to professionally-trained historians and asserts the wildest speculation as if it has the same status as the information common to the conventional historical literature. He even says that Pope Gregory VII is really Jesus.And John the Baptist is really John Crescentius
The writer is probably a Jesuit himself.
His critics have suggested that Fomenko's version of history appealed to the Russian reading public by keeping alive an imperial consciousness to replace their disillusionment with the failures of Communism Source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko)#Reception
Even if people dont believe western history. You still have Asian or African history confirming the western history
See also similar deceptions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_Chronology and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Rohl)
In short the writer deliberately falsifies evidence.
See also this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pBRNRkSgic Tweet