Well I'm sorry that asking about what you believed makes you think I changed the topic or is somehow judgmental, but I was looking for something to give me a clue as to what you were talking about, so I could continue with a reply. If I was aware that you had a certain belief system, then perhaps I could comprehend better where you were coming from. That is not a judgement, that is just a common sense way of getting answers. I don't know anyone who is philosophical about spiritualism, other than know-it-all atheists. Of course that is not your fault...it's mine. I guess I don't get out that much. I was just needing help to understand, and not getting very far with your lack of it.
All I did was post a video. Show me what the guy in the video said that is traditional or wrong in your eyes. You are the one saying you have better knowledge, or why would you want to share something of a philosophical nature with me as truth after watching that video? Apparently you viewed something in it that you disagreed with. What was that? I didn't give an opinion of the video, I just posted it. What traditional idea did the video give? For what is traditional to one person may not be traditional to another. In your mind, what exactly is the traditional thought and why do you oppose it?
What are you thoughts about the Trinity? Is that where we disagree? Is that what you are talking about when you say tradition? Because you made a big deal out of the term "son of man" and how that is not correct worship. You never said that you believed that Jesus was fully God and fully man or not. You make me have to guess at what you are talking about. Which makes me feel very foolish for even getting involved with this discussion, for you can then take the discussion any direction you want it to go and just say "you are wrong, you are wrong, you are wrong", instead of just plainly explaining your thoughts. Throwing some kind of deep thinking, philosophical ideas at me will not work to help me understand.