You assume that Beck was lying when he said that blood electrification was a cure for AIDS. Why did he say that? Because the lab research showed electricity effective against HIV. And because he treated people with AIDS and some of them obtained viral counts of below detectable levels. But now we know that HIV can hide out in various parts of the body for many years before becoming active. Also we now know that HIV has a high mutation rate of the trimeric envelope protein on its outer surface. This high mutation rate gives rise to multiple HIV subtypes.
So way back then Beck did not know those things which would prove him wrong in his assumption of blood electrification curing AIDS. But he didn't lie, not at all. Anyone else would have made the same assumption he did.
Here's what Beck said in one of his recorded talks (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMlXd9hLpcY):
"There has been a perfectly workable 95% accurate cure for HIV...
People keep asking "Why haven't they heard about this? Why aren't there hospital studies?" There's hundreds of them.
You probably recognize this laboratory, we're not supposed to say it out loud. ...Diagnostic Laboratories San Leandro [California] ...
these are PCR tests ... We started with a group of 24 AIDS subjects in 1995. Their counts, this one was 573,982 on August 30th 1995 ... this one was 418,000 etc ... Now let's take one of these along. We're not supposed to mention the [patients] name ... At this date Aug 8th 1998 he had only about 3,063 particles of HIV in his blood. But now as this test develops, if we look at this test on 11-3-98 the count was less than 100 [which is below their means of detection so it may of been zero] ... We have foot and a half stacks of these reports where every single one of these full blown AIDS patients, although many of them were on life support, many of them required attendants to lift them from the bed to the potty, these people are symptom free now, every one of them are back at work, not one of them has the symptoms of AIDS. ... There is, and has been, a cure for AIDS ... and I have been funding these out of my own pocket. ...I am paying for it myself and I am giving it to the world."
Russ Torlage of Sota Instruments said: "So far, we have treated eight PCR-tested, HIV positive customers. After treatments ranging in length between two weeks and two and a half months, they each went to zero, below detectable levels. We were absolutely astounded to get that type of documentation."
Concerning Dr. Peter Duesburg:
A logical assessment of the facts in two videos (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB8g0b-FkW0 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT3b_0doyRk) recently lead me to the conclusion that it is something in combination with HIV that causes AIDS. These videos have completely convinced me. That leaves the question of what is it then that is decreasing immunity? This site (http://www.scarf.org/drug/summary.html) says that it is the GP120 protein that the HIV carries that causes a chain reaction resulting in the death of the immune cells. They are developing a medicine to fight it but until it is readily available all patients can do is rely on dangerous drugs or do blood electrification to restrict viral infection and act as a second immune system. It is really only symptoms that ultimately matter, not HIV and CD4 counts. The presence of retrovirus antibodies is only a secondary phenomena. This is why Beck saw AIDS patients recover their health although they still had HIV.