Hopefully its true enough as theory such that we work with evidence by experience, more than education by caveat bound dogmatic repetition, so that as our experience is continualy confronted by different proposals, we might refine our interpretation and add and subtract from our educatedness.
The thoughts in the texts of Maurice Cotterell, Rupert Sheldrake and Paul La Violette, especially as compared to 100 year old coventional Maxwell less Q theory evan w all of that era's extrapolative apologetics, on these topics are fabulously interesting, desisivly revealing and hypotheticly wise, exemplary.
Mr Socrates, as Corey respectfully addressed,
delivers respectful mathmaticaly driven ideation proposing more than platitudes as light is his guide
Ah but is that light a particle, a wave, or both, or hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
trying to add ideas like virtual particles reveals attempta to rectify, but none the less the 'dnr' must be allowed to severe the no longer viable.