Re: Any fully recovered using Rife?

I do not consider a greater amount of die-off to be a good indicator. This is especially true if the die-off is repeated the second or third time. The symptoms of die-off are basically the same as those for radiation damage.

If you have a large amount of die-off on the first try and significantly less on subsequent tries, that is an indication of success on the first try. But if you have repeated die-off, day after day, then this is not success but just breaking even or worse.

RF can be less specific and cause more extensive tissue damage which can give the appearance of more die-off.

>- it has produced more movements/contractions of parasitic worms/larvaes and more die of in the phlegm and in the feces, than with electricity and electrodes.

Actual visible? or neurological responses that feel like they might be worms?

These reactions that you report should be observed with ulra-sound to show that this is what is actually happening.

>- From my tests it is more efficient and practical to use electromagnetic fields and magnetic fields

These test need to be quantified and from what I see, you are applying watts of power rather than the milliwatts produced by the zapper.

efficiency = results/power

for RF, a rating of 7 over 10 watts = 0.7 efficiency

for direct contact, a rating of 0.7 over 0.09 ( 9 volts * 10 ma ) = 7.77 efficiency

Tweet