I can find absolutly no conclusive evidence you are Andrew Huff. There is some circumstansial evidence though. Mainly the fact that much of the article is lifted word for word from an article written by Tony Isaacs. Since you are known for cutting and pasting a post and giving someone else's work Rs and taking credit, I can only assume the Huff article is another scam. Still I gave you the benefit of the doubt this time. I can understand why you don't write under your real name, that person has no cred at all. However, life would be much easier if you could choose one name and stick with it.