The trouble with me is that I have never had cancer. However, I look at things in a holistic way and use my own common sense to determine whether health treatments ring true or not.
Urine fasting is the only thing that rings true for me.
John Armstrong (The Water of Life) filled a small book with the worst examples of cancers and other deadly ailments afflicting patients who had only days or weeks left to live that were all cured with urine fasting. He advocated daily massages with urine for hours if possible, drinking water and all the urine passed, but absolutely no food. Fasts were kept up until the person felt completely well which was from 21 to 50 days. My last fast was for 20 days a couple of months ago and I am 61 yrs.
All other supplements and regimes work on various parts of the body to help it overcome diseases, but how do we know how much to use, the potency, the frequency etc. for individuals and how does it vary with the degrees of sickness? These things are too complicated for me and too specific. What if they lacked something? How do we know?
I also like the Bob Beck Protocol for ridding the body of all pathogens that cause disease, but it has been shown that even this wonderful treatment does not protect the body from the pathogens afterward. It needs to be kept up at regular intervals which means the body has not strengthened or renewed itself.
Fasting on urine according to Armstrong allows the body to regenerate all of its systems and fight disease in the way the body was designed to do it. The body makes its own changes automatically. He says it regenerates damaged systems and regrows new tissue. This is supported by the fact that urine soaked bandages on wounds prevent scars. Also, all fetuses are developed in amniotic fluid and this is mostly the baby's own urine, (google it). It was found that babies operated on in the womb had no scar when they were born.
This is a health system of its own that is more natural than any supplements or special regimes. I trust it completely for any disease.