So you're telling me over 120 published reports of Blasto being pathogenic are false because...let me get this straight....ALL their methods are wrong?"
I would agree to converse with her person who is polite? And use profanities! I am angry or you?
What on earth do you know about Blastocystis? Yes, I am saying that reports are flawed because they published by doctors who know nothing about parasites, and who cannot find the true pathogens. This is proven by so many of us? Anybody could publish a paper, in any journal, and then claim Blasto is pathogenic, because they do not find anything else! Do you not get this point. I just sent a woman on the forum who was diagnosed with Blastocystis, wrongly. Then Cahill found in her Trichuria and Giardia. Do you have a response to that?
And why all the labs she tested missed those two pathogens. This only fit the picture. I did more than 50 stool tests, and they all missed E. Histolytica. This is th case with briubody, tropicaboy, Jazzy and so many others on the forum.
If you wish go on believing what you read in reports done by incompetant doctors at your own peril. Stop using profanities and asking me to calm me down. You need to calm down; I have something to rant about. YOu do not.
YOu obviously had not even heard about something called mucus scraping?
Some of us found this hard way. Because we did our research. You do not have do any research. But do not come out here and say that we are ranting about nothing pal. I have nothing to say to you. Because your appealing to the authority of some papers published by imcompetant doctors who know nothing about proper testing only leave you in the domain of non-science that passes for scienece. When you get CURED and find out what you havce, the you can speak with authority about what you had.