CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: MMS vs H202
scherzo14 Views: 2,101
Published: 10 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,931,204

Re: MMS vs H202

"I'd imagine longterm H202 is less nasty to the body (degrades into water & oxygen, no chlorine accumulation in hair, no moving of Iodine in the thyroid) than Miracle-Mineral-Supplement , and as such would be more attracted to it for internal use."

Just as an example, in one published study, H202 administration to rats at the concentration of 0.1% for 25 weeks produced measurable oxidative damage to liver, kidney and lung tissues of all the rats --- and most likely every place else they didn't specifically check. And it damages DNA. Do you also irradiate yourself on a regular basis?

There's a reason why we produce more than one enzyme to try and break it down as fast possible. And lab animals engineered to overproduce H202 degrading enzymes in certain parts of the cell live longer, healthier lives with potentially slowed aging. In one lifespan study, rodents engineered to overproduce peroxide-degrading enzymes just in the heart alone showed dramatically extended lifespans. And you're supplementing with it???


Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2022

4.773 sec, (1)