CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: My thoughts on the 3 hr. dosing schedule
 
Michael B Views: 3,326
Published: 10 years ago
 
This is a reply to # 1,849,769

Re: My thoughts on the 3 hr. dosing schedule


Being petty, and personal, and insulting is exactly what you have been coming across as. And yes, I mirrored your behavior intentionally. If you had behaved rationally, respectfully, and kindly you most likely would have been treated the same by me.

"really? You do realize that some people have really terrible reactions to 100 mg of any chelator even taken on a three-hour dosing schedule, right? Some have negative reactions to 50 mg, some even have negative reactions to 10 mg! Are you saying redistribution happens with 10 mg of any chelator taken in the proper three-hour dosing schedule?"

Once again, you are arguing against a point I didn't even try to make. Nevertheless, your statement needs correction. If the mobilised mercury and other heavy metals are not able to exit the body during the chelation round, then obviously redistribution is going to happen, even with 10mg doses. It can and does happen. And obviously it is much MUCH more severe if a large dose is taken, and even more severe if done infrequently. People can and absolutely do make themselves worse. Some permanently. What is so hard to understand?

If you had a different experience with chelation, say, severe redistribution, you would probably be writing posts quite opposite to what you have been suggesting. You may even have started a website just like:

Dmpsbackfire.com

You thought you had a brilliant, unique thought contrary to "the masses" here on curezone; that infrequent dosing is effective and safe. Sorry, what you are saying is exactly what the masses have blindly been preaching and following, while poisoning people in the thousands. It is the reason Cutler suggested his protocol to begin with.

And contrary to your attitude that anyone who agrees with Cutler is "worshipping" him as "god", it is your own subconscious level of thinking you are projecting outward. Andy Cutler is simply a sound thinker with reasoning behind his statements. Do you believe you are somehow onto something revolutionary with what you are suggesting?

The entire purpose behind advocating frequent low dosage is for safety, not efficiency. It is not *efficient* to have to wake up in the middle of the night, and it is not efficient taking such a small dosage. But it is safe.

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021  www.curezone.org

0.641 sec, (2)