Re: Not looking.

Bewnyfur, spirituality is not a religious "property" as you appear to make it out to be.

You are looking at it from a "christian" standpoint that all spirituality is a connection with god, a "biblical god" if you wish, but that's because of your attachment to your religious belief.

Spud does not have to justify her "spirituality" to no-one and the same goes for me or anyone for that matter.

Spud has explained to you fervently that her spirituality is free from any organised religious spirituality and to any attachments within any religions.

You are constantly implying that she contradicts herself because spirituality to you is embedded into parameters that you've chosen, "religious spirituality".

Spud explains to you......

[[["There is no religion attached to my understanding, there are no rules, no moral standards made up by someone else. I don't have to serve others , or preach to others, I don't have to fear punishment, or long for reward, I can just be."]]]

Your reply......

"""This is another contradictory statement, religion literally means attachment. And according to what you have written your understanding is attached to..."no rules, no moral standards made up by someone else. I don't have to serve others , or preach to others, I don't have to fear punishment, or long for reward, I can just be." You are attached to this idea."""

Spin Bewnyfur,spin.

Spud has not contradicted, she has simply separated her
spirituality from your "religious-based spirituality".

From that you have concluded an "attachment" for the same.

She is not attached to anything but her own spirituality, for as she said "I can just be", is that not clear enough Bewnyfur ?






Tweet