"Miracle On the Hudson" was sensationalized, but CONSPIRACY?

I live in Manhattan, so I see all of the anti-terrorist and security agencies that fill the streets everyday, and there have also been many 'safety response team drills' in preparation for emergency events.

Even as I was watching the noticeably SMALL news coverage of an event that all of the tri-state area media would have jumped all over immediately, I felt it strange that there were no bystander reports, comments, Cell Phone pictures or videos that are so popular these days. The news coverage looked as though it could have come from only two cameras, and there was no extra video from any nearby security cameras or even the traffic cameras that cover the bridges constantly to show different angles. Neither was the Fire Department out in force like they do when a plane crashes at the airport. There were no preparations for fuel spillage and containment. No floatation devices were put under the plane. The first rescue boat deployed was a fireboat that took SEVEN MINUTES to reach the plane (this is Mid-town Manhattan chock full of anti-terrorists and public safety/response agencies).

There would have been a better response and more news coverage (and also be some bystander pictures) in a small town.

...and the pilot landed a 600 ton plane in winter waters STRAIGHT so that neither engine pushed the plane sideways and ripped off the wings. Hitting water at high speed is like hitting concrete, yet no structural damage and no crying panic nor reports of neck injuries, etc.

There were no ONGOING eye witness reports after the media had finished their own reporting and drama.

http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/22/the-us-airways-hudson-river-conspiracy/

http://waronyou.com/topics/assassination-by-plane-crash%E2%80%99-of-top-ameri...

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/bofa-wells-employees-were-aboard...


They let the plane sink (no floatation devices), what else did they pull from the bottom in the dark of night?



Tweet