And I am discussing the limited knowledge of science NOW. Refusing to accept today's science as having all or even most of the answers is not at all the same as rejecting science. It is you who put yourself into a box by only accepting what today's science has validated, when history has proven that it is inevitable that there will be forces and concepts validated tomorrow which today's science does not understand or accept. And it may be that there will be forces that science can never explain away- but that does not mean they do not exist.
Lack of evidence is not the same as evidence of lack.
If today's science is so powerful and all knowing, why has it been unable to create even the simplest single cell life form? We are told that life came about as a random event from the chaos of the universe. Surely we should be able to duplicate a mere accident? Instead, it appears we are the monkeys when it comes to creation.
Does life evolve? Sure it does. It adapts and evolves. But is that a mere accident, or was it perhaps designed to be that way?