Re: Understanding AIDS and its origin

 Here is a copy of an old response I wrote to someone's claim on another site:

Response:

This is wrong on several points. HIV can be destroyed by ozone because of its lipid envelope. Ozone reacts with this lipid envelope forming a lipid peroxide, destroying the virus in the process.

As for it being the "best viruses nature can create" it was not nature that created it. It was man that created it. The request for the production of the AIDS virus is public record. Look at the Senate Subcommittee Hearings for Chemical Biological Warfare Appropriations for 1970, Part 6, July 1, 1969 page 1 for the request for its production by the US government. This is the request for the production of the AIDS virus by the US government. It is a public record which can be obtained through university libraries government document sections. The US produced the virus, but in the middle of its production biological agents were outlawed by President Nixon, and the Germ Warfare unit in Bethesda had majority control turned over to the National Cancer Institute. Under Article X of the treaty banning biological warfare agents, the virus was allowed to be exchanged for "peaceful purposes", which included disease research. The virus was turned over to the Russians, founders of the WHO, to include in their "disease research". Thus the WHO started introducing the AIDS virus, along with modified versions of the Ebola virus, Marburg's virus, and Lassa Fever all in 1977 through smallpox vaccines.

For the information on introducing this and other deadly manmade viruses through vaccine programs starting in Africa in the late 70s, when and where this all began you will also need to read the Bull WHO 1972 and the Federation Proceedings 1972 (sponsored by the WHO). This is where they not only talk about specifically making synthetic viruses that will wipe out either T cell (CD4 cells), B cells or antibody production, but leaving the rest of the immune system intact, but also deliberately introducing these man-made viruses through routine vaccinations. These are their words, not mine. They then go on to say that they want to take "these well defined bacterial and viral antigens and introduce them through routine vaccinations". They called for a clean genetic pool, as found in many African tribes, so they said "family studies are strongly encouraged" and "sibships would be particularly informative". Note that these terms refer to HUMAN studies, not animal studies. It also needs to be noted that the WHO had been warned twice prior to the vaccinations that that their vaccines were contaminated with viruses, but they did nothing to correct the problem.

All the first cases of AIDS in Africa started when the WHO started their Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) and in the villages receiving the vaccines. There were also outbreaks of the weaponized versions of Marburg’s disease, Lassa fever and Ebola in the same villages receiving these vaccines and at the same time. When the vaccinations stopped these diseases all disappeared from the villages. If there was an animal, water, air, or other common vector the three diseases would not have disappeared as they did.

The first cases in Haiti occurred in the 18,000 Haitians working on the vaccine program that were themselves immunized.

In 1969, when this all began, a Russian trained doctor Wolf Szmuness, was appointed the head of the New York City blood bank the world's largest blood bank. Keep in mind that he was a communist doctor and it was the middle of the Cold War. In 1978 Szmuness started recruiting young, white, gay and homosexual men for an experimental hepatitis B vaccine program. In order to participate the men had to be under age 40, which you will see why this is important in a minute, and they had to be in good health and have no previous exposure to hepatitis B. In the first study conducted in New York City 10,000 gay and bisexual men were recruited. By the end of the study in 1984, 56% of these test subjects had full blown AIDS. This is important because when conducting trials test subjects are divided in to two groups. Roughly half of test subjects are kept as controls while the other half receive the test substance, which explains why only 56%  of the men had developed AIDS. Two larger tests were conducted at Los Angeles and San Francisco in 1980, and several smaller tests in St. Louis, Miami, and Denver. Note that every single original case of AIDS in the US were in  participants of these vaccine programs and all of these cities were the original AIDS “hot spots” These facts were pointed out in several articles published in the medical journal Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Blood samples taken from all the participants and stored. Later testing showed no diseases in any of the individuals prior to receiving the experimental vaccines.

Another interesting fact that can also be verified with a little research is that the men recruited for the experimental hepatitis vaccines had to be under the age of 40 to participate. And according to the ORIGINAL definition of AIDS set by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the CDC claimed that a person could not have AIDS if they were over the age of 40. Kind of interesting that they would say this being that they supposedly did not know much of anything about AIDS when it first appeared.

More interesting facts about AIDS:

-The US is the ONLY country in the world where AIDS was primarily seen in homosexuals. In the rest of the world the primary victims have always been heterosexuals.

-There is strong evidence that the AIDS virus originated from the US, not Africa.  There are two forms of Kaposi's sarcoma, a hallmark cancer of AIDS. The kind found in Africa was not found to be moving in to the US, but the US version was found to be moving in to Africa showing a movement of AIDS from the US in to Africa, not the other way around.

- The closest relative of HIV is the sheep maedna visna virus, which has 53% of the same genetic sequences as HIV, including the sequence for reverse transcriptase. The second closest relative is bovine leukemia virus, which has 51% of the genetic sequences. The simian (monkey) immunodeficiency virus (SIV) only has 41% of the genetic markers, which means it is not even a close relative of HIV. And in any case viruses do not mutate with such drastic changes at once. So the only way it could have made such a drastic, and sudden jump is by genetic manipulation by man.