The Warburg effect and oncogenes
Our favorite troll in the Alkaline/Acid debate forum keeps denying the fact that most cancers are caused from viruses, and keeps implying that their false interpretation of what Warburg claimed proves viruses play no role in cancer formation. Here is a link regarding the role of oncogenes (genes that cause cancer). Keep in mind that it was reported in a science Journal about a decade ago that every oncogene ever identified was viral in origin, and that NO human oncogenes had ever been found. The claim of oncogene involvement is highlighted below, and I underlined a few other interesting statements.
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/reprint/49/14/3759.pdf
"OTTO WARBURG first discovered an inverse relationship in tumor
tissues between oxidative and glycolytic metabolism using an
apparatus (Warburg apparatus) he developed to measure the
rate at which slices of living tissue consume oxygen (42). He
found that, compared with their normal counterpart tissues,
murine tumors showed attenuated mitochondrial respiration
accompanied by a high rate of glycolysis (42, 43). It is this
phenomenon that now constitutes the physiological basis for
[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDGPET)
that is used for cancer diagnosis and monitoring therapeutic
responses (13).
Normal cells convert glucose to pyruvate and then generate
ATP from pyruvate oxidation. Within the mitochondria, oxidative
phosphorylation (OXPHOS) utilizes electron flow from
a reduced substrate to molecular oxygen to synthesize ATP
from ADP and Pi. In normal cells, most of the intracellular
ATP is generated from OXPHOS (34). In the absence of
oxygen, pyruvate is converted to lactic acid in the cytoplasm,
thus completing the glycolysis cycle. Conversion of glucose
into lactic acid under normal oxygen tension, a distinct characteristic
of tumor cells, is also known as aerobic glycolysis
(14). Glucose utilization provides a constant energy supply, as
well as precursors for de novo macromolecular biosynthesis,
including DNA, RNA, fatty acids, and amino acids that are
essential for cell growth and proliferation.
Although the mechanism of the Warburg effect and its role
in malignant transformation remained elusive for many years,
there is now a rapidly growing body of molecular and biochemical
evidence indicating that oncogenes most likely underlie
the mechanism that drives the Warburg effect and
malignant transformation (3, 10, 11, 30). Multiple oncogenic
pathways including Ras, Src, and Myc have been shown to
promote malignant transformation and aerobic glycolysis
through stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)
(3, 10, 11). This apparent dependency of cancer cells on
glucose is being exploited for the development of anticancer
drugs (17, 21, 32). In fact, some anticancer drugs produce their
effects by forcing the reversal of these metabolic alterations (4,
15, 20)."