CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: 2% vs. 5%
 
  Views: 1,318
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,429,124

Re: 2% vs. 5%


I'd blame the dopeheaded minority that consumes the illicit substances. Without them, there'd be no reason for anyone to use Iodine for that illicit purpose. DEA's tactics may be too little, too late, but they're better than nothing at all, and they probably make it more difficult for the average criminal jerk to achieve a synthesis. Those heartily determined, will probably switch from method X to method Y, but my guess is that eventually they all get caught and sent to prison, if they don't get killed by "friends" or rivals first.

If the people wanted iodine, they'd have spoken en masse. They could still do it, at anytime, if it were their will to obtain Iodine at lower cost. All political power is inherent in the people - if they choose to not exercise it, it is their choice, in any society.

If the NWO is out for reducing population, they ought just relax the narcotics laws for a few months, let all the folks predisposed towards that activity kill themselves with it, then do a re-banning. Problem with that is, that a substantial chunk of the money being laundered goes through wall street and various other investment houses. Legalizing dope would likely cause the entire financial system to implode, so that option isn't even on the table.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.125 sec, (1)