Disruptive? Not really
Argumentative, yes, it seems, but that's most often the tenor of internet and even public 'debate'.
While V is clearly pulling an ad hominem attack against Moreleses (without direct substantiation so far), he hasn't hear, even if a bit heated. What has he disrupted?
He's only engaging in a back and forth discussion that he initiated and others took the bait. If he 'horned in' on a thread and started throwing grenades that would be disruptive.
He started this thread, others engaged, so it is what it is.
Argue the merits or demerits.
I'm personally just curious about the lack of substantiation in both the charge, and any reasonable back up for his stance.
Still waiting.
Provide a link. You may be right, or maybe simply malicious against someone you don't agree with. But show me th' money.
Otherwise it may just be you are venting here because of something that happened and it's safer to do so.