CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Moderating: a question of balance
Raine13 Views: 5,930
Published: 11 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,289,119

Re: Moderating: a question of balance

better to simply be a good contributor (as you, Chris, always were)and bow out
of the moderating.(imv Let the Webmaster assign (or not!) someone who's willing
to be anonymous: a wise and sensible state that has been seen to be the preferred choice, after years of witnessing human nature unfold.

Chiron, I respect you and value your posts; however, on this one issue I have to respectfully disagree. 

When Steve & Chris were appointed as moderators, the vast majority of the frequent posters were delighted with this info - who better to moderate the forum to ensure proper information was going out about water fasting than the 2 who have so openly given of their time and advice and are living examples of the benefits of water fasting.

It was not until the recent attacks by 2 members of this forum on Chris that this even became an issue.    The hard cold truth is that according to CZ rules, they have intentionally argued with a moderator and as such are subject to banning because such activity disrupts the forum.


Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2019

0.547 sec, (1)