CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Lindsy Williams: "Oil to $50 a barrel, McCain to White House"

Free Clark DVD!
Bestselling author Dr. Hulda Clark claims to have cured cancer

Holistic Health Invention Will Change Your Life !
The Tesla Shield™. Transformational ...

Original Hulda Clark
Free Shipping on orders over $49

Beautiful Skin From Powerful Oils and Roses
Remove signs of aging by renewing skin cel...

Ohfor07 Views: 3,866
Published: 13 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,224,708

Re: Lindsy Williams: "Oil to $50 a barrel, McCain to White House"

Yes, corrected, what Lindsey said he was told, not what he divined. He was much more clear on that point than I was.

And to correct QuintEssentia, $50 oil within a year does not necessarily mean before November. If oil is to be moved to $50 within the year from where it is today, this implies it will spend some time at intermediate places... perhaps $120... then $90, etc. There is certainly time to manufacture a healthy drop in oil price between now and November. However that may materialize, if it does materialize, it should not surprise to find that numerous outlets and mouthpieces attached to the media apparatus will be able to do what they deem necessary in order to float the idea that a McCain was somehow responsible...... theoretically speaking, of course, as none of this is poured in stone but is instead highly speculative. However, the same Lindsey Williams began giving lectures 2 to 3 years ago, at which time he told people "mark my words, in the very near future, you will be paying $4.00 per gallon at the pump, and $5.00 not long after that". There were at least a few people back then who thought he was off his rocker, until......... Another interesting aspect about the nature of this kind of report, informal "leak" that is is. It certainly saves the media apparatus a lot of overhead that necessary to manufacture a new series of public consciousness raising wrapped around pop culture "blockbuster movie" in order to help prod a grossly deceived and dumbed-down populous in coming to consider whatever the apparatus needs the populous to realize as plaussible.... a la "4th of July", or pick your flick, .

Just in the local area there has been natural gas corps moving in during the past 6 to 12 months. I don't know if any of them qualify as wildcatters but I do know that at least one of these groups qualify as state-sponsored squatters. A group out of Texas recently petitioned the gov to allow them to take several hundred acres of prime, rural farming areas IE> people's property, via eminent domain, in Bedford County. This is only 1/2 hour south of here; Bud Schuster territory ;) There is a bit of irony.

As we speak there are Spaniards in Texas flirting with taking huge tracts of private property via eminent domain for NAU-TTC purposes. Meanwhile, Texans are in Pennsylvania for similar motives. Following this formula, it would seem that it's time for some Pennsylvanians to petition the gov to force people in some other state, perhaps Idaho, or Washington, go give up massive swaths of their public property.... and then of course it would be Idaho's turn... and then.... and then.... let the band wagon jumping onto continue.

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021

1.563 sec, (2)