Re: 95894

You didn't offer anyting at all. An opinion based on magical, pseudoscience mechanism that have not  been observed.


No, again. There is not need for "in between" anything. ToE explains all the evidence and makes predictions that continue to be verified.  The inclusion of God is also not parsimonius and introduces an infinitely complex but still untestatable variable.


This happens all the time and those who succeed in presenting good, verifiable work end up with Nobel prizes and lauded by the scientific community.


They don't explain anything to any knowledgeable person. You might be able to pass it off to redneck creationists, those of us who know better can see that you've dug your own hole.


And you failed to present one example of such a virus.  It reads "The conservation of identifiable env-like gene features suggests that these plant elements are endogenous retroviruses whose ancestors were acquired from animal vectors." which means just what it says. SUGGESTS. And you also can't have it both ways, accept evidence for plants and ignore it when it comes to primates.  You are stuck either way with evidence that you can't explain not make any account for.


Because it is the way it is and you don't have an alternative model. Your ignorant denials of the facts can't change that.

When you can think of a good explanation for the facts, I'll be here.
Tweet