"All myth and hearsay sites in my experience. Lots of inaccuracies portrayed as fact and nothing credible"
Such absolute statements give the impression that you are not just someone interested in meteorology who suddenly popped up here after the chemtrail insider Sunver posted information about chemtrails.
With each post you make, you look more like someone with an agenda and someone whose "experience" includes a penchant for refuting non mainstream information. An unbiased truthseeker would not make such absolute denials and would have to admit to at least some truth at those sites, no matter how how skeptical their nature.
I have found a lot of pretty wild speculation on a great many non-mainstream sites, but I have seldom found them to be "all myth and hearsay" or to have absolutley "nothing credible".