CureZone   Log On   Join
Image Embedded CO2 lags temperature increase by 800 years
 

Your Ad Here
Place your ad here !



Eliminate Parasites Now!
How to Eliminate Parasites in 30 Days or Less



Atomic Particle Silver
High PPM of Atomic Size Silver Particles penetrate into pathoge...



Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenr...



Natural Health Supplement Catalog
The Best Years in Lifeís hand picked superior essent...


More
More
More
HealthEnthusiast Views: 5,062
Published: 10 years ago
 

CO2 lags temperature increase by 800 years


CO2 lags temperature increase by 800 years – not the other way around.

 

 

Carbon emissions have never driven climate change because as ice core samples clearly show, carbon dioxide is a consequence of temperature increase and not a cause of it, sometimes lagging behind by as much as 800 years.

 

 

http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/09/dont-confuse-ch.html

 

Don't Confuse Children with Facts-

 

In other posts, I have discussed the 800-year lag between temperature and CO2 in the ice core histories.  For those not aware of the issue, ice core data, like that shown by Al Gore in An Inconvinient Truth, initially showed a very strong and compelling correlation between CO2 and temperature.  Not only did CO2 look like a driver of climate, it looked like the driver.  But Gore is very careful how he presents this chart in his movie (one of his Really Big Charts).  The reason is that by the time of the movie, better instrumentation and lab procedure had shown that temperature increases in the ice core data actually preceeded CO2 increases by 800 or more years.  CO2 was being increased by heating of the oceans and outgassing of CO2 from them, not the other way around.

 

The Science and Public Policy Institute has found a pretty glaring fabrication in Laurie David's global warming propoganda book for kids.  The book shows kids this graph:

http://climate-skeptic.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/09/28/graph1.gif

 

Pretty compelling.  Every 75,000 years or so there is a CO2 spike, followed by a temperature spike.  But the SPPI folks found something interesting by going back to the original source:  Laurie David has reversed the legend.  They have called the red line CO2, when in fact it is temperature, and vice versa, reversing the causality back the way she apparently wants it.

 

http://climate-skeptic.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/09/28/graph2.gif

 

SPPI goes back to David's source just to make sure, and yes, the original study behind the chart confirms that temeprature rises before CO2.

 

On page 103 of their book, David and Gordon cite the work of Siegenthaler et al. (2005), for their written and graphical contention that temperature lags CO2. However, Siegenthaler et al. clearly state the opposite:

“The lags of CO2 with respect to the Antarctic temperature over glacial terminations V to VII are 800, 1600, and 2800 years, respectively, which are consistent with earlier observations during the last four glacial cycles.”

(Siegenthaler et al., 2005, Science, vol. 310, 1313-1317)

 

Oops.  Are lies OK if they are "for the children?"

 

 

http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.com/co2_temperature.html

 

CO2 & Temperature (also see Temperature Record)

 

The ice-core data is frequently cited as principal evidence to argue that CO2 is the earth’s main climate driver. It is, in a way, the jewel in the crown of the theory of man made global warming. But the ice-core data does not show that CO2 drives climate. It shows, very clearly, that variations in temperature precede rises in atmospheric CO2 – not the other way round. The two phenomena are divided by a time lag of several hundred years.

 

There is no evidence that CO2 has ever ‘driven’ the climate in the past, nor is there any compelling evidence that it is doing so now.

 

According to global warming theory, if an enhanced greenhouse effect (from increased levels of CO2 or indeed any other greenhouse gas) is responsible for warming the earth, then the rate of temperature rise should be greatest in that part of the earth’s atmosphere known as the troposphere, specifically in the tropics. And yet the observations, from weather balloons and satellites have consistently shown that not to be the case. I urge readers to look at the Christy et al papers below. The latest one was recently published in the Journal of Geophysical Research (2007). This may seem like a rather technical issue, but it strikes at the very heart of the theory of man made global warming.

 

The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change
Read More

 

Tropospheric temperature change since 1979 from tropical radiosonde and satellite measurements” – John R. Chirsty, William B.Norris, Roy W. Spencer, Justin J. Hnilo Journal of Geophysical Research, VOL. 112, D06102
Read More

 

 

Satellite and VIZ-Radiosonde Intercomparisons for Diagnosis of Nonclimatic Influences – John R. Christy and William B. Norris
Read More

 

Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol.109 109, D14108, doi:10.1029/2003JD004414, 2005 - an assessment of three alternatives to linear trends for characterizing global atmospheric temperature changes
Read More

 

Journal of Geophysical Research Vol. 109, D14108, doi:10.1029/2003JD004414, 2004 - an assessment of three alternatives to linear trends for characterizing global atmospheric temperature changes
Read More

 

http://www.noe21.org/dvd2/Global%20Warming%20FAQ%20-%A0%20temperature.htm

 

 

Paleoclimate and CO2
Temperature and CO2 over the Past 400 Thousand years

 

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2018  www.curezone.org

0.109 sec, (9)