CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: 6.000 times the limit - Context and no diversion
SilverFox Views: 2,266
Published: 11 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,186,383

Re: 6.000 times the limit - Context and no diversion

Hello Shortangle,

OK, let me get this straight...

Are you saying that you believe that the study where humans took a large dose of ClO2 and the doctors and scientists administering the study found no observable adverse effects has nothing to do with the safety of ingesting ClO2?

If that really is the case, why did they go on to do the 84 day study at an elevated ClO2 dose where they also found no observable adverse effects?

And, if these studies don't address the safety of ingesting ClO2, why are they included in the various reports?

Back to my original question...

How much did the people in this study take, and how does that relate to what the people that take Miracle-Mineral-Supplement are taking?


Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2019

0.531 sec, (1)