Re: Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Shelton states the opposite bling, that fasting will give the body the opportunity to feed off the cancerous growths. I myself believe that it both starves the cancer and feeds off the protein that makes it up at the same time. I believe myself that our diet is far too abundant in foods and nutrients that we just don't need, either in quantity or in quality. But we don't give our bodies the opportunity either to dump what isn't suitable to sustain our lives so the body tries to store it- but again much of it is just so alien to our bodies that it really doesn't know what to do with it. And cancer has to feed off something right, it doesn't just spontaneously grow out of nothing, nor does it eat our flesh or bones or organs, not to begin with, so it must be feeding off something we provide it with from outside. I believe that if we just ate the foods our bodies were designed to survive on there would be nothing left to feed cancerous growths. Maybe that's a bit too simplistic a view in these scientific days though.
Anyway, I know
Shelton didn't differentiate between the type of growths, he said that the body feeds off tumors for their protein, and anything that is not part of or needed for the function of our body is used as food while fasting. That includes any type of cancer. The only question is whether the damage is too much to repair before we give it the chance to begin.
I'm sorry to hear about your father in law bling. It's funny how quickly cancer has become something 'not to be bothered' about. It's just so prevalent now that it's become part of all our lives. We all know someone who's going through chemo now, or has done in the past, or who never made it, and most of us have experienced all these things. If only more people would start asking why these things are so common, why civilisation has so much more disease than is found in nature. While the status quo is the most important thing in the world these things will just never be questioned on a major scale I don't think.
Andrew.