CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: I disagree with this article's conclusions
 
InCharge Views: 3,520
Published: 17 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,068,266

Re: I disagree with this article's conclusions


So basically what you are saying is that it's better  to treat the symptoms rather than get to the root of the problem.

This is the basis and theory for all the Pharmaceutical drugs, and most often the damage from the chemicals do more damage to some other part of the body or mind. Then you get to take more chemicals, and drugs to treat the new problem.

If there was reason for doubt it was this. somebody in the FDA in agreement.

"Of particular note, in the two years since publication of their PLoS article, not a single scientific article challenged their conclusion. Indeed, the chairman of FDA Psychopharmacology Advisory Committee acknowledged that the "chemical imbalance" theory was but a "useful metaphor"--as opposed to a valid hypothesis. "

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.094 sec, (1)