The credentials I present for Dr. Lloyd are those that are available on the internet. I would think that he would have contacted me to let me know if any of the information that I present on my site about him is incorrect. He has not done so. I always correct mistakes quickly on my site and I will be glad to do so in this case, as well. I have pointed out many factual errors on your site which have yet to be corrected.
You quote Dr. Lloyd in your posting but I cannot find the source of this quotation anywhere.
As you know, Dr. Hulda Clark 's original zapper had a single frequency of 25,000 to 30,000 Hertz. Dr. Clark invented the zapper and she defined the zapper as a single-frequency device. None of this is news to you, of course, so I am a bit perplexed why you, by implication, are criticizing the definition of the inventor herself. In fact, there are no studies that I am aware of which show that a dual frequency or multi-frequency unit is superior to a single frequency unit. A single frequency, well-chosen, is all you need to kill all pathogens. This has been proven, in spades, by the 2,000 Hertz Ultimate Zapper for the past 11 years.
You state: "Actually, it [The Ultimate Zapper] may be the most powerful single frequency zapper, but that is where it ends." This is another in a long series of back-handed criticisms and snide comments that you have posted on this forum about The Ultimate Zapper. This one is really a compliment, in fact. How can the best single-frequency zapper be superior on the one hand, "and that is where it ends". Not a bad place to end, I would say, even if your criticism were true. From someone who purports to be posting to this forum to give unbiased information, and nothing more, your biased attitude is quite obvious and belies your stated role of objective observer.