Great information! All lifecycles need to be addressed
Silver Nanoparticles Beat Chemo and Make Anti-Cancer Drugs More Effective
by natural health author Tony M. Isaacs (The Silver Edge) Now, exciting new clinical research published in the journal Nanomedicine has demonstrated that adding silver nanoparticles to cancer drugs that aren’t working well against certain cancers often boosts the effectiveness of the cancer drugs, helping them stop the spread of cancer. See also:
What’s even more surprising is that the researchers discovered silver alone worked to kill the drug-resistant cancer cells better thanor equal to the chemo drugs in most instances . In other words, the silver didn’t need to be combined anti-cancer drugs in order to work against drug-resistant cancer cells! Read More.
by natural health author Tony M. Isaacs
(The Silver Edge) Now, exciting new clinical research published in the journal Nanomedicine has demonstrated that adding silver nanoparticles to cancer drugs that aren’t working well against certain cancers often boosts the effectiveness of the cancer drugs, helping them stop the spread of cancer.
The “Deadly Breast Cancer Gene” Is A Myth, Lancet Study Confirms
(GreenMedInfo) A powerful new Lancet study reveals that the so-called breast cancer susceptibility genes -- BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 -- do not, in fact, cause breast cancer. Jolie's prophylactic mastectomy, for instance, was for naught.
"The study, published in The Lancet Oncology, found 12% of 2,733 women aged 18 to 40 treated for breast cancer at 127 hospitals across the UK between 2000 and 2008 had a BRCA mutation.
The women's medical records were tracked for up to 10 years.
"During this time, 651 of the women died from breast cancer, and those with the BRCA mutation were equally likely to have survived at the two-, five- and 10-year mark as those without the genetic mutation.
This was not affected by the women's body mass index or ethnicity.
About a third of those with the BRCA mutation had a double mastectomy to remove both breasts after being diagnosed with cancer. This surgery did not appear to improve their chances of survival at the 10-year mark.”
I would like to suggest a second step after using AGE-breaker eyedrops.
The previous Japanese experiments with aminoguanidine or organic germanium (germanium sesquioxide) were only able to achieve a temporary restoration of lens clarity. This is not surprising because the AGEs were not removed from the lens - they merely recombined with the lens proteins (crystallins) when the experiment was stopped, and the lens became opaque again.
The growth of a cataract is largely due to the failure of the pump at the back of the lens, the so-called Na+/K+-ATPase pump, whereby the lens acquires nourishment from the aqueous humor and discharges waste products back into it. Were we to free up the crystallins from the shackles of the AGEs with eyedrops, preferably containing nanoparticles of AGE-breakers like water chestnut extract, we would still have to remove the AGEs from the lens. I believe this could be done by reactivating the lens pump - in other words, by re-establishing circulation within the lens - by consuming Chinese or Japanese traditional herbal medicines such as "Hachimijiogan". I found a reference on the Net stating that "Hachimijiogan" ("Ba Wei Di Huang Wan" in TCM) does reactivate the lens pump. Alone, oral consumption of these herbals might not have much effect in cataract, but combined with the use of AGE-breaker eyedrops, there may well be significant cataract reversal and permanent restoration of lens clarity.
I know it's very naughty, but I can't help wondering how many practising cataract surgeons, who continue to hypocritically extal the virtues of cataract surgery, have had the surgery themselves? How many have lost their natural lens, and now got IOLs?
And what about top ophthalmologists at international conferences who pompously lecture spellbound audiences on their surgical techniques? How many of them, and their audience? Not to mention all those researchers at all those universities studying the mechanism of cataract for the last 50 years, whose discoveries never saved a single cataract sufferer from the knife - not even one - yet smiling at us like Cheshire cats in those charming group photos, all decked out in their white lab coats, on their websites. How many of them have lost their natural lens to the knife?
It rather tempts me to say, before I succumb...I think you, Doctor, should have the surgery first.
After you, Doctor...
forum viewed 131,573 times
topics per page limited to: 20
average number of messages per page: 65
Copyright 1999 - 2018 www.curezone.org