The “Deadly Breast Cancer Gene” Is A Myth, Lancet Study Confirms
(GreenMedInfo) A powerful new Lancet study reveals that the so-called breast cancer susceptibility genes -- BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 -- do not, in fact, cause breast cancer. Jolie's prophylactic mastectomy, for instance, was for naught.
"The study, published in The Lancet Oncology, found 12% of 2,733 women aged 18 to 40 treated for breast cancer at 127 hospitals across the UK between 2000 and 2008 had a BRCA mutation.
The women's medical records were tracked for up to 10 years.
"During this time, 651 of the women died from breast cancer, and those with the BRCA mutation were equally likely to have survived at the two-, five- and 10-year mark as those without the genetic mutation.
This was not affected by the women's body mass index or ethnicity.
About a third of those with the BRCA mutation had a double mastectomy to remove both breasts after being diagnosed with cancer. This surgery did not appear to improve their chances of survival at the 10-year mark.”
“Dishonest” and “disgraceful” – Monsanto attempts to gain backdoor entry for GE foods
By Colin Todhunter, National Health Federation
January 9, 2018
Monsanto Takes on Organic In Ultimate Label Deception
At the recent Codex meeting in Berlin, there was an attempt to define genetically engineered (GE) food ingredients as ‘biofortified’ and therefore mislead consumers. This contravened the original Codex mandate for defining biofortification. That definition is based on improving the nutritional quality of food crops through conventional plant breeding (not genetic engineering) with the aim of making the nutrients bioavailable after digestion. The attempt was thwarted thanks to various interventions, not least by the National Health Federation (NHF), a prominent health-freedom international non-governmental organization and the only health-freedom INGO represented at Codex. But the battle is far from over.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission’s Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) convened in Berlin during early December and drafts provisions on nutritional aspects for all foods. It also develops international guidelines and standards for foods for special dietary uses that will be used to facilitate standardized world trade.
Based upon previous meetings, the initial intention of the Committee was to craft a definition for biofortification that could then be used uniformly around the World. Biofortification originally referred to increasing certain vitamin and mineral content of basic food crops by way of cross-breeding, not genetic engineering, for example by increasing the vitamin or iron content of sweet potatoes so that malnourished populations would receive better nutrition.
However, according to president of the NHF, Scott Tips, Monsanto wants to redefine the definition to include GE ‘biofortified’ foods and it has seemingly influenced Codex delegates in that direction. Tips says, “I am sure that Monsanto would be thrilled to be able to market its synthetic products under a name that began with the word ‘bio’.”
This year’s CCNFSDU meeting witnessed a lively debate about biofortification. At the 2016 CCNFSDU meeting, chairwoman Pia Noble (married to a former Bayer executive) had opined that the definition should be as broad as possible and that recombinant technology should be included. By the 2017 meeting, the proposed definition had morphed to include GE foods.
Deceptive marketing par excellence
The EU has raised a valid objection that “biofortification” would cause confusion in many European countries due to the widespread use of the word “bio” being synonymous with “organic.” Countries within the EU have been very vocal and support this position, arguing that the definition needs to be restrictive, not broad.
Including GE foods within any definition of biofortification risks consumer confusion as to whether they are purchasing organic products or something else entirely. “Monsanto seeks to cash in on the organic market with the loaded word ‘bio’,” argues Scott Tips.
At the Codex meeting in Berlin, Tips addressed the 300 delegates in the room. “Although NHF was an early supporter of biofortification, we have since come to see that the concept is in the process of being hijacked and converted from something good into something bad,” explained Tips.
He added that if Codex is to allow any method of production and any source to be part of the biofortification definition, it would be engaging in marketing deception of the worst sort.
As Steven Druker has shown in his book Altered Genes, Twisted Truths, GE foods should not even be on the commercial market, given the deceptions and bypassing of procedures that put them there in the first place. But now that they are on the market, most consumers want GE foods labelled. In the United States alone, some 90% of consumers want such labelling. The definition being proposed seeks to disguise GE foods under the term “biofortification.”
“That is dishonest. It is disgraceful, and for all of those sincerely concerned with the credibility and transparency of Codex, you should absolutely and positively oppose this definition,” says Tips.
The NHF feels that this is simply a strategy to gain a backdoor entry into countries for GE foods that are unneeded and unwanted. In his address to the assembled delegates, Tips added, “It is a very sad state of affairs where we have come to the point where we must manipulate our natural foods to provide better nutrition all because we have engaged in very poor agricultural practices that have seen a 50% decline in the vitamins and minerals in our foods over the last 50 years. We will not remedy poor nutrition by engaging in deceptive marketing practices and sleight of hand with this definition.”
The delegates to various Codex committees tend to be national regulatory bureaucrats and representatives from large corporations, including agritech giants like Monsanto. These interests have undue influence within Codex. Over the years, although heavily outnumbered at meetings, Scott Tips and his colleagues at the NHF have been tireless in their efforts to roll back undue corporate influence at Codex. Thanks to NHF and others urging the committee to adopt a clear, non-misleading definition that excluded GE foods, no final decision was taken on the definition of biofortification.
It is now left to the committee to resolve the matter at next year’s meeting or even the one thereafter.
The National Health Federation
The National Health Federation is the only health-freedom organization accredited by the Codex Alimentarius Commission to participate at all Codex meetings. It actively shapes global policies for food, beverages, and nutritional supplements.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission is run by the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization. Its some 27 committees establish uniform food-safety standards and guidelines for its member countries and promote the unhindered international flow of food goods and nutritional supplements.
10 New Year's Resolutions for a Healthier 2018 and Beyond
by Tony Isaacs
author of Cancer's Natural Enemy
(The Best Years in Life) It's that time of year again when many of us resolve to make improvements in our lives and habits for the coming year. Often, such resolutions have to do with improving our health, such as losing excess weight or quitting smoking. Besides such obvious areas as weight loss and putting down cigarettes, there are a number of other resolutions many of us could make to improve our health. Here are ten such resolutions which are almost certain to lead to a healthier 2018 and beyond: Read More.
by Tony Isaacs
Another Questionable Study Being Used to Condemn Eating Red Meat
by Tony Isaacs
author of Cancer's Natural Enemy
(The Best Years in Life) Vegans and vegetarians have been quick to embrace a new study which "proves" the link between red meat consumption and cancer. The headline in The Telegraph reads "Red meat triggers toxic immune reaction which causes cancer, scientists find". According to the article, scientists at the University of California "discovered that the human body views red meat as a foreign invader and launches an immune response". Then how to explain the extremely low incidence of cancer for the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of years that humans have been eating red meat? Read More.
Every Mass Shooting in the Past 20 Years has One Thing in Common – and It’s Not Guns
by Barbara Minton
See all TBYIL articles by Barbara Minton
(The Best Years in Life) In a move to further gut the Second Amendment and assure that only criminals and the government will have guns, President Obama has unveiled his new gun control plans as he continues to call for reducing the number of guns in spite of our Constitutionally guaranteed right to own them and the will of the Congress which has rejected his anti-gun programs. What he continues to ignore is that most mass shootings are the province of Big Pharma, makers of SSRI drugs that encourage suicide and mass killings. To reduce the mayhem, it isn't guns which should be curtailed - it is SSRIs.
We are living in extremely advanced technological times, and now car thieves have had to update their method of theft to “Keep up with the Joneses.” This new method of theft allows car thieves to steal a car that utilizes “keyless entry” with an easy to buy tool that gives them unfettered access to the car’s entry system.
According to the U.K. Express, this method has been seen in the United States this year and has now moved into other parts of the Western world. The method requires two thieves who work in tandem to gain access to vehicles that have a keyless entry system.
First, there is a tool that these hackers buy that can be easily purchased off the internet for around $100. This tool allows one of the thieving partners to intercept the signal from the key fob and then use that replicated signal to open the vehicle.
Dubbed, “the relay method,” one of the partners has to stand next to the car while the other stands close to the key fob. For this reason, many of these thefts occur when cars are parked at night near residential areas.
“The radio connection between keys and car can easily be extended over 100 meters, regardless of whether the original key is, for example, at home or in the pocket of the owner,” a spokesman for the German company ADAC said in an earlier Express article.
That spokesman also found that, “A whopping 110 cars from 27 different manufacturers were found to be at risk.”
According to The Sun, some of the most vulnerable vehicles to this type of attack are, the “BMW 740, Ford Focus RS, Toyota’s Prius and VW Golf 7 GTD,” as well as Mercedes and Peugeot.
The advent of the convenient keyless entry system has given rise to an even more convenient way for car thieves to steal your vehicles. So what can you do to protect your property?
Well, according to The Sun, drivers are encouraged to put their key fobs into a “Faraday cage” when they are at home in order to block the fob’s electronic signal. Another suggestion is to put a tracking device into the vehicle in order to detect its location in case a theft does occur.
It’s always wise to be prepared.
forum viewed 17,028,784 times
topics per page limited to: 20
average number of messages per page: 59
Copyright 1999 - 2018 www.curezone.org